Joshua Seek

Personal Meanderings of Joshua Seek 

Update: Google Transit coming soon to Phoenix

After my previous rant about Google Transit not being available in Phoenix and the responses I received when I inquired about it, it looks like Valley Metro is set to release their information to Google Transit.  Hooray for progress!

 

From Rail Life:

Have you heard of Google Transit, a feature of Google Maps that began in October of 2007 and now covers 445 cities worldwide? Google Transit helps you get around town using the “Get Directions” feature of Google Maps and the option to use public transit.

Valley Metro has been working with the 14 member cities of the Regional Public Transit Association (RPTA) to bring this feature to Valley residents. We’ve covered a lot of ground in the testing phase, but it’s a big Valley with a lot of transit routes to verify so we’re not yet ready to introduce it for use. Here’s a little more about what Google Transit will do once it’s online (using a test account set up for us by Google): Like any trip using Google Maps, I input my origin and destination. In this case I want to leave the Valley Metro offices to go to the Phoenix Zoo. I’ve expanded the options section to tell Google I want to leave the office at 10:00 am, and I want to use public transit.

When I click on “Get Directions” the map shows me public transit options, and I can click on the bus icon to get more information on the route selected.

More at Raillife

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   go green   google transit   light rail   new urbanism   open source   Phoenix   transportation   valley metro  

Comments [0]

Que Sera, Sera

I used to be a big fan of talk radio, but eventually my blood pressure prohibited me from listening to another minute of some guy moaning about how horrible the state of affairs is.  I switched to my iPod for a while, but eventually began listening to NPR.  You'll receive more information on NPR in ten minutes than you would in three hours of talk radio.

My favorite show on NPR is Prairie Home Companion.  I don't even know what the show is about, but hearing soft music and stories about Lake Wobegon is very relaxing.  Here is a pretty funny rendition of Que Sera, Sera that was on this past weekend.

 

 

When I was 25 years old,

I asked my mother, What will I be?

Will I handsome? Will I be smart?

She chuckled quietly.


Que sera, sera

Your future is up to fate

Your prospects are not that great

Que sera, sera


When i was 43 years old

I asked my therapist what I should do

Should I get married to someone I love?

She said ok, but who?



Kay Sera is nice

She's only been married twice

She's willing to sacrifice

Marry Kay Sera



She was no beauty she was short 

had a big nose and big dark eyes brows

She wasnt charming but she had a job

and owned her very own house


Kay Sera and I 

Were married ten years ago

On a trip down to Mexico

With her brother, Joe


Now I am old and Kay and I

We live together day by day

Winters are endless, but what the hey

We get along ok


Kay Sera and I

We're happy, I don't know why

It could be worse, I say

So would Kay Sera

 

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

His name is Sam

I am not an apologist for Brian McLaren.  I have one of his books, which I thought was pretty good, but I could pretty much take or leave much of what he says.  I do have an issue though when people dismiss outright - or cry heresy on - a person or idea based on their preconceived notions.  Virgel, below, gives a good story on this:

 

by Virgil Vaduva
There is a perception I have that smoking cigars and discussing theology is a mix that God is somehow present in; the smoke of premium, hand-rolled cigars rolling up to the heavens must be reminding God of the good aroma of temple sacrifices, prompting him to descend and participate in the conversation. There is a verse somewhere supporting that, isn’t it?

Today I walked into the cigar store to spend some time reading and meditating, but after about an hour someone sat down close by and started discussing with someone else the book I gave to the storeowner earlier which was likely laying on the counter, A New Kind of Christianity by Brian McLaren. As I was also reading the same book, I interjected and asked what his objections were – I couldn’t understand how a 200-page book could be critiqued after a minute of examination.

Sam, the older African-American man explained to me that the chapter on Who is Jesus? was way off, and that McLaren is not teaching solid, biblical theology. He was clearly familiar with who Brian was so I did not want to wander in a debate over Brian McLaren. Instead I started talking to him trying to find out what really is the source of his antipathy; but despite my efforts, I could not connect with Sam at all. I found that everything I was saying was subjected by Sam to an If/Then conditional analysis, in that I would make a statement, Sam would compare it with his paradigm, then say that he agrees or disagrees with it. The truth is that I really was not interested in whether or not this man agreed or disagreed with what I was saying – I was simply interested in talking to him.

After about 30 minutes, the nicotine finally kicked in, and after being grilled on what I believe about the Bible we finally sort of connected; I shared with him my story, I told him about the problems I see with western Christianity and I encouraged him to look at me based on what we have in common rather than where we differ. Sam shared with me some of his story, his love for John MacArthur, and his previous hate of white men telling him about Christ. I asked him if he sees the arrogance and the imperialism in western evangelical Christianity, and he said he does. I even told Sam about the wonderful news of the Kingdom of God being a reality, something within his grasp, but he rejected it in favor of a depraved present world but a positive future judgment and bodily resurrection, which he told me, is the good news of the Gospel.

We ended up having a great conversation and exchanged some opinions, but somehow I still felt disconnected; I never really, really connected with the guy. I realized that Sam and I operate on two completely different levels. Sam’s world is that of modernity, the world of John MacArthur, one of neatly organized doctrinal points where a person either is in or out, saved or damned, where very little happens outside of the well-established game rules, the world where Sam feels the need to tell me how things are, or at least how things should be. My world is a bit more chaotic, a world where everything is questioned, re analyzed constantly, where anything goes and very little stays the same, where I don’t really feel the need to convince Sam that he is right or wrong, or that he is saved or damned to hell for eternity, where I don’t subject someone to a set of questions before conversing with him.

Today’s conversation with Sam really opened up my eyes to how far off I have walked from evangelical Christianity, and my friends, that makes me very happy; but it also makes me sad. Sam is obviously a good man, his love for God was tangible and real, he had passion about his faith and about what he believed; I can no longer connect with someone like Sam, at least not well – even if we try, we end up talking past each other more than to each other. And that is sad and frustrating; despite the embrace I gave him when he left.

I am not writing this to claim that I am better or superior in my approach than Sam, that is far from it; I am just writing about it to illustrate the generational shift taking place within the Church, something which perhaps confirms Phyllis Tickle’s claim that we are in the middle of a Great Emergence, a new reformation or perhaps self-assessment of the Church, where we sit back, sifting through what we’ve accumulated over the past 500 years, deciding what to keep and what to toss out. One thing is for sure; we cannot continue the way of Sam and expect our message to be viable; note that I said, our message, not Christ’s message.

And the identity of the message is really the key here; the modern church is slowly losing viability over the requirements it places on those walking in, while the “emergent church” (whatever you want that to mean) doesn’t object to being full of hypocrites, liars, adulterers, prostitutes, homosexuals and degenerates – yes, with people like me. It’s message before change, not change before message – embrace of all men, not conditional interaction.

His name is Sam; I hope I see him again – next time I’ll start with the embrace.

via Planet Preterist

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   A New Kind of Christianity   Brian McLaren   emergent   faith  

Comments [1]

On running and delusional meta-cognition [The Tip of Africa]

This morning we were scheduled for a 30k trail run.  I should have known from the start it wasn’t going to be pretty.  We started 3 hours late (due to a sale at Cape Storm that we wanted to hit up first—no good finds) and it was beginning to get warm.  My shoulders were super tight and I was feeling particularly grumpy.  Finally at 9 I drug myself off the couch and we were out the door.  The first 27:30 was on the road climbing the mega hill up to Rhodes Memorial and the trail head.  Once we reached the trailhead and began climbing, I noticed an unusual group of hikers.  An African mama with her babe strapped to her back, a few very young kinds strewn out along the trail.  We came to a meadow about 5 minutes up and there was a group of people spread out in the grass singing, praying, and ululating.  Further still we climbed, with their music still in our ears until we reached another group of people praying and singing. We climbed on, listening to sounds of the worshippers mixing with the sound sounds of the mountain—wind blowing in the grass and trees, animals scurrying through the bush—I looked up at the mountain and saw the clouds whisking over the top.  All of creation declares His glory.  For a few minutes my grumpiness vanished.

We ran along our trail until it seemed to just end.  We scrambled down the side of the mountain to an old road that leads to the cable car.  We decided to take an alternative route back.  We spent the next 2 hours ascending monstrous hills only to find that we had gone the wrong way.  We got tired of running back down the hills at the crest of one such hill, we decided we would make our own way.  I soon found myself using clumps of grass as holds so as not to slide down the mountain…all the while cursing the decision and praying I didn’t come across a Cape Cobra or a Puff Adder.  We finally got back on a trail and headed for home.  While running, I think I got a bit delusional and I started to think about all the things I think about when I’m running.  Then I thought…”I’m thinking about thinking—that’s meta-cognition.  But now I’m thinking about thinking about thinking…is that meta-meta-cognition?  Then I realized I needed to stop.  Here are a few things I often think about while I’m running:

-Early in the morning I often take notice of who else is on the street at sunrise.  We live in a beautiful green suburb against the mountain and lots of people—mostly white people—run and cycle here in the morning.  If I’m alone, I sometimes join a fellow runner on the road.  Almost everyone else on the pavement at that time is black…and they aren’t out enjoying their morning run or cycle-they are walking to work at 6AM.  By the time I greet them, they have already traveled by minibus from the outskirts and are now walking to the homes and shops of the wealthy—who often underpay them.  I smile but inside I want to scream and tell them they are worth more than they are paid.  Some of the mamas smile and say “Good-morning Sweets” and I have to hold myself back from hugging her.

-I often think about storytelling and will tell myself a story as I run.

-I come up with all my creative ideas when I’m running—often they never get executed because they are so lofty.

-Like this morning when we saw the worshippers on the mountain, I often find myself communing with God.  There is actually a specific hill that every time I run down I laugh aloud and usually find myself singing, “I’m alive, I’m alive, I’m alive, I’m alive…Jesus, you are my king…” I stare at the mountain, with it’s swooping clouds and have to remind myself to watch wear my feet are going.

- I believe we were made to run.  Seriously.  And not just run but run far.  Our ancestors carried on for hours (or days) at a time hunting and gathering food, migrating, etc.  There is a tribe in Mexico that will run like 300 miles through the mountains (read Born to Run), barefoot or in sandals made out of tires.  People often say, “I’m just not made for running” and I think that’s absurd.  Modern society has made us soft, lazy, and unhealthy.  All this darn pavement and the cars that go on it haven’t helped much either. I have much to say about this and all sorts of conspiracy theories about who is on it but we can save that for another day.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Google and the NSA Sitting in a Tree, Improving Cyber-S-E-C-U-R-I-T-Y [Cybersecurity]

Google and the NSA Sitting in a Tree, Improving Cyber-S-E-C-U-R-I-T-Y

How did one of the world's largest search engine companies wind up deciding to collaborate with the one federal agency most renowned for spooky spying?

Let's review. Someone hacked Google. Google hacked right back. Then Google decided to piss some people off by refusing to continue censoring search results in China—the country of origin for the original cyberattacks.

Now the big G is working with some G-men in hopes of gaining "more certainty about the identity of the attackers." According to the NYT, there's also a rather good reason that Google choose the NSA out of all the government agencies around:

By turning to the N.S.A., which has no formal legal authority to investigate domestic criminal acts, instead of the Department of Homeland Security, which does have such authority, Google is clearly seeking to avoid having its search engine, e-mail and other Web services regulated as part of the nation's "critical infrastructure."

That along with remarks that the agreement between Google and the NSA "will not permit the agency to have access to information belonging to Google users" is hardly enough to comfort any paranoid minds, but what are we supposed to do? The deal's made. [NY Times]

It's a little freaky that the NSA might have access to Google's data. But it's not like they couldn't have accessed it anyways. NSA is a crazy-ass organization. If you think the CIA is the king of spying, the NSA is way cooler. Google has been genius in the manner they've acted. They aren't political. They aren't a country. They're business, and China understands business. They should do whatever they can to force China's hand.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

How real is church for you?

My friend Christian has some awesome points on how we experience church environments:

 

The other day, I received a message in my Facebook inbox titled “Is it real?”  In the message, the sender said:

Sometimes I feel like church isn’t always about God completely. Sure we all bow our heads and close our eyes, and pray about the world’s problems, but how much do you want to bet over half of the audience isn’t paying attention, their thoughts are lost somewhere else, or they just don’t care?

I don’t like the idea of a routine habit kind of church. The kind where we all show up, have awkward conversations about things we normally don’t talk about, and then go into a building to hear songs, we dance and sing (do we really mean it? Or is part of us only doing it so people think better of us?) and then we listen to leaders talk, which they talk to you about God (I like this part). After that, we all bow our heads, close our eyes, and pray (habit?) and then it’s over. We all continue our not-usual church-appropriate conversations, and then leave church, not planning on thinking about God ’til next time.

I’d absolutely like to hope that’s not how it works, but why does it feel like parts of that is true?

How many of us, if we truly thought about it, experience church this way?

How many of us, come Sunday, take our “Christian outfit” out of the closet, shine it up, wear it proudly to church, and then, once we’re home, put it away for another week?

 

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [0]

Valley Metro and Google Transit

I'm pretty interested in public transportation.  I've lived in Arizona my entire life.  I've visited other cities and I've been amazed by the design of public transit.  Recently, I was able to board a plane to Seattle, connect to the local transit system, and walk 100 feet to my friend's front door - and it didn't take too long.  The only time I used a car the entire day was to get from my house to Sky Harbor.  The new light rail system in Phoenix has excited me and I've used it quite frequently

 

About six months ago, I inquired with Valley Metro about using Google Transit.  Google Transit allows public transit agencies to share their information and embed it into Google Maps.  A rider can input their start and end addresses and receive detailed directions on how to get there.  You can even change the route around. The current system on the Valley Metro website allows users to plan their routes, but they are nonsensical.  A user has to have the EXACT crossroads they are at.  Any misspelling will cause the system to misinterpret your request.  You cannot see it on a map, so you have no idea where you are being taken.  Accessing the website via a mobile phone is a waste of time - by the time you can get the website to understand your request, you've missed you're connection.

 

These are my actual experiences.

 

So instead, I call Valley Metro's phone number, which is a voice activated system - useless on a loud bus or on the light rail when announcements are being broadcast from the loudspeakers.  Attempting to get a live representative on the line will take about six minutes.

 

So we have a problem with data management.

 

Enter Google Transit.  Now, Google is not the solution to everything, but it can be very helpful.  Google Transit will allow users to have easier access to transit data, and could increase ridership.  

 

The responses I received from Valley Metro weren't very encouraging.  The first person I spoke to - in media relations - was fairly snotty about the issue.  After being blown off by this person, I called and spoke to another person at Valley Metro who gave some great information.  They told me that there is internal strife within Valley Metro and the cities involved over sharing data.  This confirms comments made here.  

 

So the agency is sensitive about who uses their data.  Valley Metro seems to consider their schedules to be proprietary information.  Why?  Who is your competition?  You put out transit books every year with your schedule in them.  It's not some big company secret.  I can even access the schedules online.

 

What is the harm in opening up your information to developers.  The only thing I can see is that Valley Metro intends to charge for use of their information, which is stupid, because if they open up their data they could increase revenues through more riders.

 

The solution would be to open the data up to everyone.  Give the data to Google.  Give it to anyone who asks.  Print it in open source databases.  Allow anyone to develop applications with it.

 

What will this do?  Valley Metro RPTA will receive more riders.  The cities involved will be recognized as innovators in public transportation and information sharing.  Riders will benefit with more ways to access information.  Businesses can encourage employees to "go green" by developing systems to show them how to get to work using Valley Metro.  We all benefit by cleaner skies.

 

Valley Metro and cities of Maricopa Country:  Just do it already!

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   go green   google transit   light rail   new urbanism   open source   Phoenix   transportation   valley metro  

Comments [0]

Does This Recycle? What to Do If You're Not Sure [Lifehacker]

Does This Recycle? What to Do If You're Not Sure

Even the most avid recyclers have moments of brain freeze where we forget if something can be recycled or needs to be just tossed out. Here's what to do when you're not sure.

Photo by clurr.

Of course, the easiest approach would be to fling the item into the regular trash. On the other hand, is it really that big of a deal if you guess wrong and toss an non-recyclable item in with your other recyclables? Slate's Nina Shen Rastogi says that depends.

A single plastic cup in the wrong trash bin isn't going to bring the entire recycling industry to its knees, so mixing similar items—like milk jugs and yogurt cups, for example—isn't much to worry about. Putting distinctly different materials together, however, might cause a big headache (think glass bottles in machinery meant to digest plastic recyclables). Most unwanted items will be culled at the recycling facility before they can do any damage, but it never hurts to be proactive.

If you think the packaging from the frozen dinner you just ate might be recyclable but you're not sure, here's what to do:

The next time you find yourself hovering indecisively over a set of trash bins, here are some rules of thumb. Plastics marked No. 1 or No. 2 are virtually guaranteed to be accepted, so go ahead and toss them in with your recycling. Newspaper, corrugated cardboard, magazines, and office paper are almost always good to go as well. If your mystery object doesn't fall into one of those categories, trash it.

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   enviroment   lifehacker   recycling  

Comments [0]

the writings of the early church fathers on violence

When I read Shane Claiborne's "Jesus for President", it radically changed my views on violence. I realized that a large part of my belief system was built on violence - against nonbelievers, "lesser" believers, enemies, and ideas. My world was opened to a really clear understanding of non-violence. At Tad Delay's blog, he's given some great information on the history of non-violence in Christianity.

This post comes in response comes as the result of 1) the daily number of hits i get from people Googling “early church + nonviolence” and 2) the sheer lack of information on this topic i’ve uploaded here. But i’ve kept a up a list of quotes on this matter for a while now. Though they couldn’t seem to agree on afterlife, atonement, church structure, the role of women, or even the nature of Jesus, there was one topic which the early writers of Christianity held a remarkably unanimous opinion on: choosing violence is antithetical to gospel. However we want to interpret Jesus, we must admit that the early hearers of the message found this theme unavoidable. That the cross and the sword do not mix well has been lost on the church with great severity since the great sub/conversion of Constantine, and i think it is an conviction we need to reclaim. One note I should point out: it is often mistakenly argued that the church was against serving in military because it would involve them in persecution of fellow Christians. First, this demonstrates some amount of historical ignorance; contrary to the understanding of many, it simply was not illegal to be a Christian for any but about 15 years of Rome’s existance (and when it was, it was expressly because Christians refused patriotism; refusing to show respect to gods and emperors was akin to burning the flag today). But beyond this fact, note that the problem of being involved in persecution is nowhere to be found in the arguments of the church fathers against participation in violence.  Instead, they beckon insurrection by nonparticipation.

I hope these writings encourage you like they have me:

—————

The Early Church on violence, military, and government:

Above all, Christians are not allowed to correct with violence.

Clement of Alexandria

I do not wish to be a king; I am not anxious to be rich; I decline military command… Die to the world, repudiating the madness that is in it.

Tatian’s Address to the Greeks

We who formerly used to murder one another now refrain from even making war upon our enemies.

—The First Apology of Justin Martyr

Whatever Christians would not wish others to do to them, they do not to others. And they comfort their oppressors and make them their friends; they do good to their enemies…. Through love towards their oppressors, they persuade them to become Christians.

—The Apology of Aristides

A soldier of the civil authority must be taught not to kill men and to refuse to do so if he is commanded, and to refuse to take an oath. If he is unwilling to comply, he must be rejected for baptism. A military commander or civic magistrate must resign or be rejected. If a believer seeks to become a soldier, he must be rejected, for he has despised God.

Hippolytus of Rome

There is nothing better than peace, in which all warfare of things in heaven and things on earth is abolished.

Ignatius of Antioch to the Ephesians

The new covenant that brings back peace and the law that gives life have gone forth over the whole earth, as the prophets said: “For out of Zion will go forth the law, and the word of the Lord from Jerusalem; and he will instruct many people; and they will break down their swords into plowshares, and their spears into pruning hooks, and they will no longer learn to make war.” These people formed their swords and war lances into plowshares,” that is, into instruments used for peaceful purposes. So now, they are unaccustomed to fighting, so when they are struck, they offer also the other cheek.

Irenaeus

We would rather shed our own blood than stain our hands and our conscience with that of another. As a result, an ungrateful world is now enjoying–and for a long period has enjoyed–a benefit from Christ. For by his means, the rage of savage ferocity has been softened and has begun to withhold hostile hands from the blood of a fellow creature. In fact, if all men without exception…would lend an ear for a while to his salutary and peaceful rules,…the whole world would be living in the most peaceful tranquility. The world would have turned the use of steel into more peaceful uses and would unite together in blessed harmony.

Arnobius

Wars are scattered all over the earth with the bloody horror of camps. The whole world is wet with mutual blood. And murder–which is admitted to be a crime in the case of an individual–is called a virtue when it is committed wholesale. Impunity is claimed for the wicked deeds, not because they are guiltless, but because the cruelty is perpetrated on a grand scale!

Cyprian of Carthage

Those soldiers were filled with wonder and admiration at the grandeur of the man’s piety and generosity and were struck with amazement. They felt the force of this example of pity. As a result, many of them were added to the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ and threw off the belt of military service.

—Disputation of Archelaus and Manes

We have rejected such spectacles as the Coliseum. How then, when we do not even look on killing lest we should contract guilt and pollution, can we put people to death?

Athenagoras of Athens, A Plea for the Christians

In that last section, decision may seem to have been given likewise concerning military service, which is between dignity and power. But now inquiry is made about this point, whether a believer may turn himself unto military service, whether the military may be admitted unto the faith, even the rank and file, or each inferior grade, to whom there is no necessity for taking part in sacrifices or capital punishments. There is no agreement between the divine and the human sacrament, the standard of Christ and the standard of the devil, the camp of light and the camp of darkness. One soul cannot be due to two masters–God and Caesar. And yet Moses carried a rod, and Aaron wore a buckle, and John is girt with leather, and Joshua the son of Nun leads a line of march; and the People warred: if it pleases you to sport with the subject. But how will a Christian man war, nay, how will he serve even in peace, without a sword, which the Lord has taken away? For albeit soldiers had come unto John, and had received the formula of their rule; albeit, likewise, a centurion had believed; still the Lord afterward, in disarming Peter, unbelted every soldier. No dress is lawful among us, if assigned to any unlawful action.

-Tertullian, On Idolatry 19

“‘Nation will not take up sword against nation, and they will no more learn to fight.’ Who else, therefore, does this pro phecy apply to, other than us?” Tertullian (c. 197, W) 3.154.

“A soldier of the civil authority must be taught not to kill men and to refuse to do so if he is commanded, and to refuse to take an oath. If he is unwilling to comply, he must be rejected for baptism. A military commander or civic magistrate who wears the purple must resign or be rejected. If an applicant or a believer seeks to become a soldier, he must be rejected.” recorded by Hyppolytus.

“Oh emperor, it is the Christians that have sought and found the truth, for they acknowledge God. They do not keep for themselves the goods entrusted to them. They do not covet what belongs to others, but they show love to their neighbors. They do not do to another what they would not like done to themselves. They speak gently to those who oppress them, and in this way, they make their enemies their friends. It has become their passion to do good to their enemies. They live in the awareness of their own smallness. Everyone of them who has anything gives ungrudgingly to the one who has nothing. And if any of them sees a homeless stranger, they bring them into their own home, under their roof. If anyone of them becomes poor while the Christians have nothing to spare, then they fast two or three days until everyone can eat. In this way, they supply for the poor exactly what they need. This, oh emperor, is the rule of life for the Christians. This is how they live.

Aristides- historian quote
137 AD

“[Origen, quoting Celsus:] “If everyone were to act the same as you Christians, the national government would soon be left utterly deserted an without any help, and affairs on earth would soon pass into the hands of the most savage and wretched barbarians.” [Origen:] Celsus exhorts us to help the Emperor and be his fellow soldiers. To this we reply, “You cannot demand military service of Christians any more than you can of priests.” We do not go forth as soldiers with the Emperor even if he demands this. [Origen goes on to say that if the Romans followed the teachings of Jesus there would be no barbarians.]
-Origen

“We who formerly treasured money and possessions more than anything else now hand over everything we have to a treasury for all and share it with everyone who needs it. We who formerly hated and murdered one another now live together and share the same table. We pray for our enemies ad try to win those who hate us. “- Justin Martyr

“I do not wish to be a ruler. I do not strive for wealth. I refuse offices connected with military command. I despise death.” – Tatian

The Lord, in disarming Peter, disarmed every soldier.

Tertullian’s On Idolatry

Christians could never slay their enemies. For the more that kings, rulers, and peoples have persecuted them everywhere, the more Christians have increased in number and grown in strength.

Origen, Contra Celsius Book VII

Wherever arms have glittered, they must be banished and exterminated from thence.

Lactantius, Divine Institutes IV

As simple and quiet sisters, peace and love require no arms. For it is not in war, but in peace, that we are trained.

Clement of Alexandria, Chapter 12 of Book 1

In their wars, therefore, the Etruscans use the trumpet, the Arcadians the pipe, the Sicilians the pectides, the Cretans the lyre, the Lacedaemonians the flute, the Thracians the horn, the Egyptians the drum, and the Arabians the cymbal. The one instrument of peace, the Word alone by which we honor God, is what we employ.

Clement of Alexandria, Chapter 4 of Book 2

“Do not avenge yourself on those who injure you… let us imitate the Lord, who when he was reviled, reviled not again; when he was crucified, he answered not; when he suffered, he threatened not; but prayed for his enemies.”
“Nothing is better than peace, by which all war of those in heaven and those on earth is abolished.”
Hippolytus (approx. A.D. 200)

“The soldier of the government must be taught not to kill men. If ordered to, he shall not carry out the order, nor shall he take the military oath. If he does not accept this, he must be rejected for baptism. A military commander or civic magistrate must resign or be rejected. The believers who wish to become soldiers shall be cast out, because they have despised God.”
Tertullian (wrote between A.D. 195-212)

“I owe no duty to forum, campaign, or senate. I stay awake for no public function. I make no effort to occupy a platform. I am no office seeker. I have no desire to smell out political corruption. I shun the voter’s booth, the juryman’s bench. I break no laws and push no lawsuits; I will not serve as a magistrate or judge. I refuse to do military service. I desire to rule over no one – I have withdrawn from worldly politics! Now my only politics is spiritual – how that I might be anxious for nothing except to root out all worldly anxieties and care.”
“Inquiry is made whether a believer is able to turn himself into military service… But how will a Christian wage war, indeed how will he serve even in peace without a sword, which the Lord has taken away? …The Lord in disarming Peter, unbelted every soldier.”
“What will be God’s if all things are Caesar’s?”
“All zeal in the pursuit of glory and honor is dead in us. So we have no pressing inducement to take part in your public meetings. Nor is there anything more entirely foreign to us than the affairs of state. We acknowledge one all-embracing commonwealth – the world. We renounce all your spectacles.”
“For what difference is there between provoker and provoked? The only difference is that the former was the first to do evil, but the latter did evil afterwards. Each one stands condemned in the eyes of the Lord for hurting a man. For God both prohibits and condemns every wickedness. In evil doing, there is no account taken of the order… the commandment is absolute: evil is not to be repaid with evil.”
“As for you, you are a foreigner in this world, a citizen of Jerusalem, the city above. Our citizenship, the apostle says, is in heaven.”
“Shall it be held lawful to make an occupation of the sword when the Lord proclaims that he who uses the sword shall perish by the sword? And shall the son of peace take part in the battle when it does not become him even to sue at law? Shall he who is not to avenge his own wrongs be instrumental in bringing others into chains, imprisonment, torment, death?”
“The Lord will save them in that day – even His people – like sheep… No one gives the name of ‘sheep’ to those who fall in battle with arms in hand, or those who are killed when repelling force with force. Rather, it is given only to those who are slain, yielding themselves up in their own place of duty and with patience – rather than fighting in self-defense.”
Julian

“I am a Christian, and therefore I cannot fight.”
Origen (approx. A.D. 250)

“What if the law of nature – that is, the law of God – commands what is opposed to the written law? Does not reason tell us to bid a long farewell to the written code… and to give ourselves up to the Legislator, God. This is so even if in doing so it may be necessary to encounter dangers, countless labors, and even death and dishonor.”
“It is not for the purpose of escaping public duties that Christians decline public offices, but that they may reserve themselves for a divine and more necessary service in the church of God for the salvation of men.”
“How was it possible for the Gospel doctrine of peace, which doesn’t permit men to take vengeance even on their enemies, to prevail throughout the earth, unless at the coming of Jesus a milder spirit had been introduced into the order of things?”
“Our prayers defeat all demons who stir up war. Those demons also lead persons to violate their oaths and to disturb the peace. Accordingly, in this way, we are much more helpful to the kings than those who go into the field to fight for them. And we do take our part in public affairs when we join self-denying exercises to our righteous prayers and meditations, which teach us to despise pleasures and not to be led away from them. So none fight better for the king than we do. Indeed, we do not fight under him even if he demands it. Yet, we fight on his behalf, forming a special army – an army of godliness – by offering our prayers to God.”
“We have come in accordance with the counsels of Jesus to cut down our warlike and arrogant swords of argument into ploughshares, and we convert into sickles the spears we formerly used in fighting. For we no longer take sword against nation, nor do we learn any more to make war, having become sons of peace for the sake of Jesus, who is our leader.”
“If all the Romans were to be converted they will by praying overcome their enemies – or rather they will not make war at all, being guarded by the Divine power, which promised to save five whole cities for the sake of fifty righteous men.”
Athenagoras (approx. A.D. 180)

“We have learned not only not to return blow for blow, nor to go to law with those who plunder and rob us, but to those who smite us on the one side of the face to offer the other side also, and to those who take away our coat to give likewise our cloak.”
“We cannot endure even to see a man put to death, though justly.” Testament of Our Lord (approx. A.D. 220)

“If a soldier or one in authority wishes to be baptized in the Lord, let them cease from military service or from the post of authority. And if not, let them not be received.” 
Lactantius (early 4th century)

“It can never be lawful for a righteous man to go to war, whose warfare is in righteousness itself.”
“When God prohibits killing, he not only forbids us to commit brigandage, which is not allowed even by the public laws, but he warns us not to do even those things which are legal among men. And so it will not be lawful for a just man to serve as a soldier – for justice itself is his military service – nor to accuse anyone of a capital offense, because it makes no difference whether thou kill with a sword or with a word, since killing itself is forbidden. And so, in this commandment of God, no exception at all ought to be made to the rule that it is always wrong to kill a man, whom God has wished to be regarded as a sacrosanct creature.”
“When we suffer such ungodly things, we do not resist even in word. Rather, we leave vengeance to God.”
“The Christian does injury to no one. He does not desire the property of others. In fact, he does not even defend his own property if it is taken from him by violence. For he knows how to patiently bear an injury inflicted upon him.”
“When God forbids us to kill, he not only prohibits us from open violence… but he warns us against the commission of those things which are esteemed lawful among men. Thus it will be neither lawful for a just man to engage in warfare… Therefore, with regard to this precept of God, there ought to be no exception at all; but that it is always unlawful to put to death a man, whom God willed to be a sacred animal.”
“We do not resist those who injure us, for we must yield to them.”
“When men command us to act in opposition to the law of God, and in opposition to justice, we should not be deterred by any threats or punishments that come upon us. For we prefer the commandments of God to the commandments of man.”
“Someone will say here: ‘What therefore, or where, or of what sort is piety?’ Assuredly it is among those who are ignorant of war, who keep concord with all, who are friends even to their enemies, who love all men as their brothers, who know how to restrain their anger, and to soothe all madness of mind by quiet control.”
“God might have bestowed upon his people both riches and kingdoms, as he had given previously to the Jews, whose successors and posterity we are. However, he would have Christians live under the power and government of others, lest they should become corrupted by the happiness and prosperity, slide into luxury, and eventually despise the commandments of God. For this is what our ancestors did.”
“Why should the just man wage war, and mix himself up in other people’s passions – he in whose mind dwells perpetual peace with men?”
Clement of Alexandria (approx. A.D. 195)

“Christians are not allowed to use violence to correct the delinquencies of sins.”
“Man is in reality a pacific instrument.”
“The followers of peace use none of the implements of war.”
“We have made use of only one instrument, the peaceful word, with which we do honor to God.”
“We are being educated, not in war, but in peace.”
“We are the race given over to peace.”
“[Christians] are an army without weapons, without war, without bloodshed, without anger, without defilement.”
 Tarachus (3rd century)

“I have led a military life, and am a Roman; and because I am a Christian I have abandoned my profession of a soldier.” 
Marcellus (approx. A.D. 298)

“I threw down my arms for it was not seemly that a Christian man, who renders military service to the Lord Christ, should render it by earthly injuries.”
“It is not lawful for a Christian to bear arms for any earthly consideration.”
 Irenaeus (approx. A.D. 180)

“Christians have changed their swords and their lances into instruments of peace, and they know not now how to fight.” 
Justin Martyr (approx. A.D. 138)

“The devil is the author of all war.”
“ We, who used to kill one another, do not make war on our enemies. We refuse to tell lies or deceive our inquisitors; we prefer to die acknowledging Christ.”
“We who had been filled with war and mutual slaughter and every wickedness, have each one – all the world over – changed the instruments of war, the swords into ploughs and the spears into farming instruments, and we cultivate piety, righteousness, love for men, faith, and the hope which is from the Father Himself through the Crucified One.”
“We who hated and slew one another, and because of differences in customs would not share a common hearth with those who were not of our tribe, now, after the appearance of Christ, have become sociable, and pray for our enemies, and try to persuade those who hate us unjustly, in order that they, living according to the good suggestions of Christ, may share our hope of obtaining the same reward from the God who is Master of all.”
“As to loving all men, he has taught as follows: ‘If ye love only those who love you, what new thing do ye do? For even fornicators do this. But I say to you: Pray for your enemies and love those who hate you and bless those who curse you and pray for those who act spitefully towards you.’ … And as to putting up with evil and being serviceable to all and without anger, this is what he says: ‘to him that smiteth thy cheek, offer the other cheek as well, and do not stop the man that takes away thy tunic or thy cloak. But whoever is angry is liable to the fire. Every one who impresses thee to go a mile, follow for two. Let your good works shine before men, that seeing them they may worship your Father in heaven.’” 
The Martyrdom of Maximilian (A.D. 295)

Maximilian, a young Numidian, was brought before an African proconsul named Dion in A.D. 295 for induction into the army. Maximilian refused to join, stating: “I cannot serve as a soldier; I cannot do evil; I am a Christian.” Dion threatened Maximilian, stating: “Get into the service, or it will cost you your life.” With courage, Maximilian did not yield to the threat of death: “I shall not perish, but when I have forsaken this world, my soul shall live with Christ my Lord.” Later he refused the royal badge that had the sign of the emperor on it, saying, “I do not accept your mark, for I already have the sign of Christ, my God… I do not accept the mark of this age, and if you impose it on me, I shall break it, for it is worth nothing.” The outcome was that on March 12, 295, Maximilian was executed. Maximilian’s father returned home, “giving thanks to God that he had been able to bring such a present to the Lord.” Later, as a special honor, his body was brought to Carthage and buried near the tomb of Cyprian, a great leader in the church, who had also died as a martyr. -Commodianus

“Make thyself a peace-maker to all men.”
 Cyprian (approx. A.D. 250)

“[Christians] are not allowed to kill, but they must be ready to be put to death themselves… it is not permitted the guiltless to put even the guilty to death.”
“God wished iron to be used for the cultivation of the earth, and therefore it should not be used to take human life.”
“The whole earth is drenched in adversaries’ blood, and if a murder is committed privately it is a crime, but if it happens with state authority, courage is the name for it. Impunity is claimed for the wicked deeds, not on the plea that they are guiltless, but because cruelty is perpetrated on a grand scale.”
“We should ever and a day reflect that we have renounced the world and are in the meantime living here as guests and strangers.”
Hermas (approx. A.D. 150)

“You know that you who are the servants of God dwell in a strange land. For your city is far away from this one. If, then, you know your city in which you are to dwell, why do you here provide lands, and make expensive preparations, and accumulate dwellings and useless buildings? He who makes such preparations for this city cannot return again to his own… Do you not understand that all these things belong to another, and are under the power of another? …Take note, therefore. As one living in a foreign land, make no further preparations for yourself except what is merely sufficient. And be ready to leave this city, when the master of this city comes to cast you out for disobeying his law.”
Arnobius (approx. A.D. 310)

“If all without exception . . . would lend an ear for a little to Christ’s salutary and peaceful rules… the whole world, having turned the use of steel into more peaceful occupations, would now be living in the most placid tranquility, and would unite in blessed harmony, maintaining inviolate the sanctity of treaties.”
“Since we – so large a force of men – have received from Christ’s teachings and laws, that evil ought not to be repaid with evil, that it is better to endure a wrong than to inflict one, to shed one’s own blood rather than stain one’s hands and conscience with the blood of another, the ungrateful world has long been receiving a benefit from Christ, through whom the madness of savagery has been softened, and has begun to withhold its hostile hands from the blood of a kindred creature. But if absolutely all who understand that they are men by virtue, not of the form of their bodies, but of the power of their reason, were willing to lend an ear for a little while to his healthful and peaceful decrees, and would not, swollen with pride and arrogance, trust to their own senses rather than to his warnings, the whole world would long ago have turned the uses of iron to milder works and be living in the softest tranquility, and would have come together in healthy concord without breaking the sanctions of treaties.”
“Did Christ, claiming royal power for himself, occupy the whole world with fierce legions, and, of nations at peace from the beginning, destroy and remove some, and compel others to put their necks beneath his yoke and obey him?”
Ambrose

“The soldiers of Christ require neither arms nor spears of iron.”
“The servants of God do not rely for their protection on material defenses but on the divine Providence.”
Tatian (approx. A.D. 160)

 

Loading mentions Retweet
Filed under  //   history   nonviolence   pacifism   Shane Claiborne   tad delay  

Comments [0]

Who Sinned?

As he went along, he saw a man blind from birth. His disciples asked him, "Rabbi, who sinned, this man or his parents, that he was born blind?"

"Neither this man nor his parents sinned," said Jesus, "but this happened so that the work of God might be displayed in his life. As long as it is day, we must do the work of him who sent me. Night is coming, when no one can work. While I am in the world, I am the light of the world."

With the news from Haiti bringing images of horrible suffering, people of faith have, as they have many times before, attempted to explain the reason God would allow (or commit) such an act of tragedy.  The most infamous of these, recently, has been Pat Robertson's remarks that the Haitian people practice voodoo.  Thus, God's judgment.

We're no strangers to this kind of talk.  John Piper recently inferred that a tornado in downtown Minneapolis was God's judgment against the ordination of homosexuals.  Many human maladies, from natural disasters, to disease, famine, and poverty, have been linked to some sort of cause-effect of sin and judgment.  Our views have been shaped by the gods of Rome, who reigned from above with vengeance and a lightning bolt.

We have a God of salvation, whose wrath has been poured out on the cross. We exist in a paradox of God's love, surrounded by the effects of a tarnished creation.

We ask the same question of the disciples when tragedy happens. Who sinned to cause this disaster? Who can we blame for this?

Our eyes are closed to another purpose. Tragedy in our world can be used to show God's glory. We can go out to the blind, the impoverished, and the people in bondage, and show God's glory through helping them.

Having said this, he spit on the ground, made some mud with the saliva, and put it on the man's eyes. "Go," he told him, "wash in the Pool of Siloam" (this word means Sent). So the man went and washed, and came home seeing.

His neighbors and those who had formerly seen him begging asked, "Isn't this the same man who used to sit and beg?" Some claimed that he was.

Others said, "No, he only looks like him."

But he himself insisted, "I am the man."

"How then were your eyes opened?" they demanded.

He replied, "The man they call Jesus made some mud and put it on my eyes. He told me to go to Siloam and wash. So I went and washed, and then I could see."

"Where is this man?" they asked him.

"I don't know," he said.


We can be God's glory. We can go out to this tragedy, and instead of looking to know who caused it, we can bring healing. Healing that alters their lives, until they are unrecognizable from the person they were before.  His glory can be seen through our healing work in the world.

Instead of asking, "Who sinned," we can instead ask how we can bless others.

Loading mentions Retweet

Comments [2]